Family Law Reform Blog
Wednesday, February 22, 2006
  Why marriage shouldn't be like a corporation
The New Pantagruel blog recently featured a hilarious and thought-provoking satire of a playfully-written but ultimately serious article in the San Francisco Chronicle that said corporations should provide marriages, offering consumers an infinite variety of definitions, combinations, rules, and exit options.
 




<< Home
News and comments on changes, problems and developments in family law, family structure, culture and policy.
NY JUDGE WOULD MAKE DIVORCE TOO EASY
NY NOW leader opposes Unilateral Divorce in NY Tim...
Statement on New York Divorce Reform
New book includes deep critique of unilateral divorce
Baltimore Building Strong Families Program -- rebu...
Kansas City Star | 02/17/2006 | Divorce, Johnson C...
Court says American divorce trumps Islamic one - B...
India faces dangers of overseas arranged marriages
Daily Herald - Bill requiring counseling before di...
Great new case affirms children's rights to both p...
Archives
February 2006 / March 2006 / July 2006 / September 2006 / October 2006 / November 2006 / December 2006 / January 2007 / March 2007 / April 2009 /

Name:
Location: Arlington, Virginia, United States

I am a long-time family-law and estate-planning lawyer who believes in improving divorce, but more importantly, preventing it. I am for: the traditional family, non-traditional families, joint custody, child support, alimony, collaborative divorce, mediation, and marriage skills training. I am against: divorce, one-parent families, domestic violence, child abduction, alienation, patriarchy, matriarchy, and selfish, immature parenting. Contradictory? That’s what makes family law so interesting.


Powered by Blogger